It is currently Tue Jun 18, 2013 6:31 am

All times are UTC




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 20 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Dismounted dragoons
PostPosted: Tue Jul 24, 2012 9:16 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jan 27, 2005 3:41 pm
Posts: 1915
Location: Scotland
I can't find any info on how dragoons performed when dismounted, I have assumed that they just skirmished and I know some had taken part in storming parties at sieges but were they also trained to form lines and fire volleys like normal infantry? Also if they were trained to form lines would they form up in 3 or 6 lines of troops depending on which army they came from? The main reason I'm asking is if I should base them up as normal infantry or fit them onto a wider base as skirmishers.
Cheers
Dave


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Dismounted dragoons
PostPosted: Tue Jul 24, 2012 11:09 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Oct 08, 2005 2:18 am
Posts: 540
Location: Petawawa, Ontario, Canada
To add to Dave's comments above were dragoon regiments in our period formed in companies or sqds? From what I have read from the earlier 17th Century in regards to Cromwell's Dragoon Regiment in the NMA it was companies.

The Scots Dragoons did dismount at Blenheim and fought as infantry. The failed French counter attacked at Ramillies on the French right/ Confederate Left was made by dismounted dragoons.

cheers
Edward

_________________
Captain of Dragoons


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Dismounted dragoons
PostPosted: Tue Jul 24, 2012 11:43 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jan 27, 2005 3:41 pm
Posts: 1915
Location: Scotland
Captain of Dragoons wrote:
To add to Dave's comments above were dragoon regiments in our period formed in companies or sqds? From what I have read from the earlier 17th Century in regards to Cromwell's Dragoon Regiment in the NMA it was companies.
Edward


The lists I've been looking at for the Irish Jacobite cavalry all mention how many troops they have and I seem to remember reading somewhere that 3 or 4 troops were used to form squadrons.
Hope this helps.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Dismounted dragoons
PostPosted: Tue Jul 24, 2012 11:47 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jan 27, 2005 3:41 pm
Posts: 1915
Location: Scotland
Captain of Dragoons wrote:
The Scots Dragoons did dismount at Blenheim and fought as infantry. The failed French counter attacked at Ramillies on the French right/ Confederate Left was made by dismounted dragoons. Edward


The French had a number of dismounted dragoons defending barricades on their right flank at Blenheim but I can't find any reference to how they actually fought, was it in formed ranks firing as line infantry. I'm basically looking for info on the Irish Jacobite dragoons and as most of those were hastily formed with little time for training I would assume they would only skirmish when dismounted. This seemed to be how O'Neil's dragoons fought when defending the ford at Rosnaree.
Cheers
Dave


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Dismounted dragoons
PostPosted: Wed Jul 25, 2012 12:38 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Feb 02, 2008 11:49 pm
Posts: 1428
Location: Chester-Le-Street, Durham, UK
Hi Dave & Ed,

First of all the Boyne, it was Colonel Sir Niall O'Neill's dragoon regiment that defended the ford at Rossnaree against Count Schomberg's flanking column.
The first attempt to cross was made by the Dutch Guard Dragoons of Eppinger's regiment who were repulsed.
O'Neil's dragoon's kept up a steady rate of fire and due to holding good cover managed to repulse every attempt to cross the ford.
Eventually Schomberg's infantry and a small artillery piece arrived at the ford.
O'Neill was mortally wounded and the catholic dragoon's turned tail and fled the field.

Sorry to bring Blenheim into this, but all 12 French squadrons of dragoons were dismounted from the start of the battle. Stationed on the French right wing between Blenheim village and the river Danube defending a barricade.
The dragoon's of Ross's brigade (7 squadrons) remained mounted during most of the battle.
It was only after the failed assaults on the village by Lord Cutts that Marlborough ordered the village to be surrounded.
Lord Cutts asked for the dragoons to be dismounted and help in the blockade of the French regiments inside Blenheim village.

Dave, in BLB2 they fight mounted as "Bullet Cavalry" which means their slightly worse off than "Blade Cavalry".
They dismount into infantry, but each squadron needs a horse holder and so are based with 5 dragoons to each infantry base.
When I get round to doing mine I'll have 3 figures in the front rank and 2 figures in the 2nd rank.

Ed, I'm not 100% sure, but I think it's 2 companies to each squadron.

Opp's Dave we must have been typing on this topic at the same time. :)

Cheer's,

Ray.

_________________
Over the hills and O'er the Main,
To Flanders, Portugal and Spain,
The Queen commands and we'll Obey,
Over the Hills and far away.

George Farquhar "The Recruiting Officer" 1706.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Dismounted dragoons
PostPosted: Wed Jul 25, 2012 10:32 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jan 27, 2005 3:41 pm
Posts: 1915
Location: Scotland
Churchill wrote:
First of all the Boyne, it was Colonel Sir Niall O'Neill's dragoon regiment that defended the ford at Rossnaree against Count Schomberg's flanking column.
Ray.


I'm trying to figure out how they were fighting, was it skirmishing or did they form ranks like regular infantry but not as well?
The French dragoons defending at Blenheim I would think because of the small area they were cramped into would try to fight like regular infantry, I assume? but I was just trying to find out if this was something that they practiced.
Cheers
Dave


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Dismounted dragoons
PostPosted: Wed Jul 25, 2012 10:36 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jan 27, 2005 3:41 pm
Posts: 1915
Location: Scotland
Churchill wrote:
Dave, in BLB2 they fight mounted as "Bullet Cavalry" which means their slightly worse off than "Blade Cavalry".
They dismount into infantry, but each squadron needs a horse holder and so are based with 5 dragoons to each infantry base.
When I get round to doing mine I'll have 3 figures in the front rank and 2 figures in the 2nd rank.
Cheer's,
Ray.


Thanks Ray but I already knew how they operate under the rules, it was their historical training and use I was trying to discover.
Cheers
Dave


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Dismounted dragoons
PostPosted: Wed Jul 25, 2012 3:25 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 29, 2011 11:53 am
Posts: 157
Location: Poland
Imperial dragoons when on foot formed in 3 ranks and used regular infantry tactic.

_________________
Maciek

http://zealandbayonets.blogspot.com/
wargaming in 10mm


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Dismounted dragoons
PostPosted: Wed Jul 25, 2012 3:28 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Feb 02, 2008 11:49 pm
Posts: 1428
Location: Chester-Le-Street, Durham, UK
Dave without digging any deeper, I can only quote on O'Neil's dragoon's who were raised in 1687 and numbered around 480 effectives.
They were regarded as among the best of the Jacobite regiments, having fought in Sarsfield's campaign to recapture Sligo.
Two other dragoon regiments, that of Dongan's and Clare's fought mounted at Yellow Island during the battle of the Boyne.
They were sent against the Danes and prevent them from consolidating their position.
It was 700 against 7,000 and closing with the infantry, O'Brien's regiment rode straight into a Danish volley and was driven off.
Dongan's dragoon's were facing a regiment of Danish cavalry, unlike the Danish foot, the Danish Horse had been raised specifically to serve in Ireland and were among the most inexperienced troops in William's army.
It was a uneven contest and Dongan's men scattered their opponents sending them fleeing back across the river.
I would rate the Jacobite cavalry in Ireland as at least "Drilled", with some regiments even being rated higher.
There seem's to be alot of important Jacobite Officer's killed at the Boyne, which had a negitive effect on the troop's under there command.
Dongan was struck by a Williamite shot and killed. Demoralized, both Jacobite dragoon regiments pulled back towards Donore in disorder.

obriendavid wrote:
it was their historical training and use I was trying to discover.


It seem's they were used both mounted and dismounted with some success. :wink:

Cheers,

Ray.

_________________
Over the hills and O'er the Main,
To Flanders, Portugal and Spain,
The Queen commands and we'll Obey,
Over the Hills and far away.

George Farquhar "The Recruiting Officer" 1706.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Dismounted dragoons
PostPosted: Wed Jul 25, 2012 4:21 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Jun 13, 2007 11:58 am
Posts: 99
I want to correct a statement made in Rray's last post. He stated:
Quote:
the Danish Horse had been raised specifically to serve in Ireland and were among the most inexperienced troops in William's army.
. I strongly disagee with this. The three Danish regiments of horse were raised by taking drafts from the existing 10 regiments of Danish horse. This was common practice in the period, and wasn't the British Guard battalion in the AWI formed the same way? Where they "inexperienced"? The men and officers in the Danish regiments were exercised and drilled, and were no more inexperienced than the Horse or either side. In fact, compared with the Jacobite and English horse were probably more experiened. I don't know where this "myth" started, but it is completely erroneous. There is no foundation for it.

Sorry for hijacking this thread.

Dan


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Dismounted dragoons
PostPosted: Wed Jul 25, 2012 4:57 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Dec 06, 2009 6:14 pm
Posts: 158
obriendavid wrote:
Churchill wrote:
First of all the Boyne, it was Colonel Sir Niall O'Neill's dragoon regiment that defended the ford at Rossnaree against Count Schomberg's flanking column.
Ray.


I'm trying to figure out how they were fighting, was it skirmishing or did they form ranks like regular infantry but not as well?
The French dragoons defending at Blenheim I would think because of the small area they were cramped into would try to fight like regular infantry, I assume? but I was just trying to find out if this was something that they practiced.
Cheers
Dave


You prolly already know this, but in the period drill books, the dismounted dragoons drill is identical to the regular infantry drill. And I haven't seen anything in them that has specific instructions for anything we would call a skirmish drill.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Dismounted dragoons
PostPosted: Wed Jul 25, 2012 5:06 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jan 27, 2005 3:41 pm
Posts: 1915
Location: Scotland
No need to appolgise Dan I found the points you put forward very interesting as I too have read on a number of accounts that the Danes were very inexperienced. From your comment I suppose you could perhaps they were inexperienced at operating together but as the regiments tended to fight as seperate troops or squadrons then that lack of 'experience' wouldn't come into play.

To hijack my thread even further, we had similar problems trying to rate the Sardinian troops in the Crimea as the troops were well officered, had some experience but battalions and cavalry regiments were made up from different companies from different regiments so had never operated together before but Barry and myself both decided that were still good quality troops and should be rated as such. Fortunately their performance at the Tchernya lived up to our rating. :D
Cheers
Dave


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Dismounted dragoons
PostPosted: Wed Jul 25, 2012 5:11 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jan 27, 2005 3:41 pm
Posts: 1915
Location: Scotland
maciek wrote:
Imperial dragoons when on foot formed in 3 ranks and used regular infantry tactic.


Thank you!
Do you have any references for more info on dismounted dragoon tactics?
It's really annoying that all those authors and eyewitness' all those years ago didn't consider us poor wargamers trying to decypher what their few comments actually meant.
Cheers
Dave


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Dismounted dragoons
PostPosted: Wed Jul 25, 2012 7:20 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Sep 28, 2009 6:56 pm
Posts: 308
Location: Lanarkshire
Very interesting regarding the Danish cavalry, I too have seen reference made to the poor quality of the Danish horse at the Boyne, this being attributed to them being newly recruited. I was puzzled as to why they would be new recruits when the Danes were hired out across Europe in an almost permanent arrangement, and as cavalry are both a lot more expensive to equip, and take much more time to train, I would think that they were very unlikely to be recruited at short notice, given the time scale of the Irish campaign.

However that doesn't explain their poor performance against the Jacobite horse, may just have been poorly led on the day, or has been mentioned with the Jacobite regiments, the loss of key commanders can dishearten most troops, even if they have the upper hand.

Bob

_________________
We are not retreating - we are advancing in another direction. Macarthur, Douglas


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Dismounted dragoons
PostPosted: Wed Jul 25, 2012 8:48 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jan 27, 2005 3:41 pm
Posts: 1915
Location: Scotland
toggy wrote:
Very interesting regarding the Danish cavalry, I too have seen reference made to the poor quality of the Danish horse at the Boyne, this being attributed to them being newly recruited. I was puzzled as to why they would be new recruits when the Danes were hired out across Europe in an almost permanent arrangement, and as cavalry are both a lot more expensive to equip, and take much more time to train, I would think that they were very unlikely to be recruited at short notice, given the time scale of the Irish campaign.

However that doesn't explain their poor performance against the Jacobite horse, may just have been poorly led on the day, or has been mentioned with the Jacobite regiments, the loss of key commanders can dishearten most troops, even if they have the upper hand.
Bob


It could be that they were caught whilst still trying to form up from crossing the river, I seem to remember reading that by the time they were crossing the river it was rising again.
Cheers
Dave


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 20 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

All times are UTC


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group