Figure comparisons

A section devoted to questions and answers for this period.
Post Reply
Rob Herrick
Brigadier General
Brigadier General
Posts: 419
Joined: Fri Oct 16, 2009 1:37 am
Location: Cincinnati, Ohio, USA

Figure comparisons

Post by Rob Herrick » Tue Aug 07, 2012 11:04 pm

Digging through the pile of old lead, I found two 12/14 figure battalions of 25mm Imperialist Miniatures British - well loved, but in desperate need of updating.

How well do other figure ranges mix with Imperialist? I was thinking of purchasing some additional command figures (preferably ones with cast closed hands) and maybe some different poses of other ranks to liven things up a bit.

I presume Front Rank would noticeably stand out, but how well do other manufacturers (like Dixon, Ebor, Old Glory or WARFARE) mix with Imperialist?
With Gen'l Custer Down in Mexico: Yes, one of the goals is to see how many times one can get him killed.
User avatar
Redmist1122
Major General
Major General
Posts: 549
Joined: Sun Dec 28, 2008 6:43 pm
Location: United States
Contact:

Re: Figure comparisons

Post by Redmist1122 » Tue Aug 07, 2012 11:52 pm

Rob,
I purchased a bunch of Imperialist Miniatures earlier this year for my GNW project, and work fine with Foundry (Old series) and Dixon. I used the command to supplement where I was short. I have no complaints.

Hope this helps.
Greg P.
Tucson, AZ, USA
EvilGinger
Brigadier General
Brigadier General
Posts: 462
Joined: Fri Sep 23, 2011 10:27 am
Location: Burton On Trent

Re: Figure comparisons

Post by EvilGinger » Wed Aug 08, 2012 4:24 am

if Dixon work with them then so will Warfare as I have mixed both successfully especially the Dixon LoA range.

:evil: Ginger
Rob Herrick
Brigadier General
Brigadier General
Posts: 419
Joined: Fri Oct 16, 2009 1:37 am
Location: Cincinnati, Ohio, USA

Re: Figure comparisons

Post by Rob Herrick » Wed Aug 08, 2012 1:04 pm

What about Ebor?
With Gen'l Custer Down in Mexico: Yes, one of the goals is to see how many times one can get him killed.
Clibinarium
Major
Major
Posts: 195
Joined: Sat Mar 26, 2005 8:47 pm
Location: Ireland
Contact:

Re: Figure comparisons

Post by Clibinarium » Wed Aug 08, 2012 3:19 pm

Clarence has a comparison pic on his blog. While I like the clean sculpting of the Front Rank figures, clearly they are very big compared to the others. Comparisons with Ebor and Imperialist, I can't answer.

Image
User avatar
barr7430
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 5905
Joined: Tue Jan 04, 2005 4:22 pm
Location: EK,Scotland
Contact:

Re: Figure comparisons

Post by barr7430 » Wed Aug 08, 2012 3:47 pm

No idea about Ebor. I took the picture in question when I first took over Warfare. Nothing will fit with FR in terms of size. Issues of sculpting style are a taste thing pure and simple. FR have a great reputation and their casting quality is very high. I would say, on a table any larger that 6 x 4 discrete units of FR will sit fine with anything else. They would not mix well in the same unit and close up scrutiny shots of the type often seen on this forum and galleries would look odd.

Of course I would love everybody into the period to by Warfare but that is not credible. Wargamers by nature have varying degrees of OCD, it depends what your OCD reading is as to whether you will want to kill yourself for mixing various manufacturers.

There is probably space for all those involved right now even the less than serious players.
"If you think you can, or if you think you can't, you are probably right"

Henry Ford
User avatar
dashing blade
Lieutenant Colonel
Lieutenant Colonel
Posts: 221
Joined: Sun Mar 21, 2010 9:34 pm
Location: The Red Rose County

Re: Figure comparisons

Post by dashing blade » Wed Aug 08, 2012 4:03 pm

I know its a different period,but Front Rank Napoleonics mix very well with Victrix. I have both in the same unit and you wouldnt know. :!:
(The historical evidence that God comes from Lancashire is slim, however he's definitely not from Yorkshire)
User avatar
El Cid
Sergeant Major
Sergeant Major
Posts: 99
Joined: Mon Sep 19, 2011 7:27 pm
Location: Austria
Contact:

Re: Figure comparisons

Post by El Cid » Wed Aug 08, 2012 4:43 pm

I collected and painted Foundry in my earlier days, but now changed to Frontrank.
Yes, it's a matter of taste, but it's also the size.
They're easier to paint for an old half-blind guy like me.
I can still see (most) details.
EvilGinger
Brigadier General
Brigadier General
Posts: 462
Joined: Fri Sep 23, 2011 10:27 am
Location: Burton On Trent

Re: Figure comparisons

Post by EvilGinger » Wed Aug 08, 2012 4:45 pm

Rob Herrick wrote:What about Ebor?
Haven't got any Ebor yet much as I am tempted mostly because Richard Clarke has stolen all my wargaming budget & worse my very limited painting time of late. I do want some as I want more Warfare & Dixon the advantage of the latter being that as Spirit Games stocks them I can sneak in & get me fix off the shelf.

:evil: Ginger
User avatar
Russian James
Colonel
Colonel
Posts: 357
Joined: Mon May 28, 2012 11:43 am
Location: Glen Clova, by Kirriemuir, UK
Contact:

Re: Figure comparisons

Post by Russian James » Wed Aug 08, 2012 7:00 pm

I have some Ebor WSS figures, the infantry look as though they would fit perfectly with Barry's WF range however the cavalry looks more like Front Rank.

I'll try and get a pic up later this evening...
User avatar
barr7430
Site Admin
Site Admin
Posts: 5905
Joined: Tue Jan 04, 2005 4:22 pm
Location: EK,Scotland
Contact:

Re: Figure comparisons

Post by barr7430 » Wed Aug 08, 2012 8:00 pm

different sculptors... a risk I am managing myself at the mo!
"If you think you can, or if you think you can't, you are probably right"

Henry Ford
User avatar
Russian James
Colonel
Colonel
Posts: 357
Joined: Mon May 28, 2012 11:43 am
Location: Glen Clova, by Kirriemuir, UK
Contact:

Re: Figure comparisons

Post by Russian James » Wed Aug 08, 2012 8:52 pm

Hope this helps. Must admit I was a bit disappointed at the larger size of the Ebor cavalry...
Attachments
P1020398.JPG
Front Rank - Ebor - WF
P1020398.JPG (135.74 KiB) Viewed 9581 times
P1020396.JPG
WF - Ebor
P1020396.JPG (122.56 KiB) Viewed 9581 times
P1020395.JPG
Front Rank - WF - Ebor
P1020395.JPG (123.38 KiB) Viewed 9581 times
Post Reply