Page 1 of 1

King's regiment of foot

Posted: Thu Jun 11, 2015 3:08 am
by daniel1492
Old Glory figures.

Image

Re: King's regiment of foot

Posted: Fri Jun 12, 2015 6:58 am
by chema1986
Very nice figures!! Although the command figures are Warlord's

Re: King's regiment of foot

Posted: Sun Jun 14, 2015 5:27 am
by Prince Henry
They look great!

Re: King's regiment of foot

Posted: Sun Jun 14, 2015 6:47 am
by barr7430
VERY NICE WORK

Re: King's regiment of foot

Posted: Mon Jun 15, 2015 10:39 pm
by daniel1492
Thanks gents. Yes the command stand is warlord games and bicorne. i am wrapping up Sir Lewis Dyve's regiment at the moment and will have some pics up this weekend.

Re: King's regiment of foot

Posted: Tue Jun 16, 2015 9:07 am
by Ronan the Librarian
Very nice.

Just a couple of small points that you can ignore or not, as the fancy takes you. When monteros - the caps you have painted off-white - were issued to the Royalist army in 1643 and 1644, they were part of the uniform and hence the same colour (red or blue) as the coats and, I think uniquely for English troops, the breeches (men were usually expected to provide their own legwear; the King's Army at Oxford and the Scots Covenanter armies were pretty much the only exceptions).

As regards headgear specifically, monteros appear to have been worn by all but pikemen issued helmets (very few at Oxford, it seems) and the wealthiest officers (although Rupert famously wore a red one). The "Guy Fawkes" style wide-brimmed hats were very rare among the rank-and-file, due to cost; the woollen "monmouth" cap was much more common among troops from the west and south-west in particular, and the English bonnet among northerners.

Lastly, the individual items in the uniform "suits" issued at Oxford were sometimes made by different contractors; thus you might get a cap, coat, and breeches that were officially all red (or all blue), but which might each be in a different shade of that colour.

Hope that helps (and doesn't seem too "fashion fascist").